May 24th, 2006
Conflicting Claims
1) The only 100% pedal energy efficient full suspension design.
2) The world’s most efficient and traction-aiding suspension system.
They can’t both be right.
1) The only 100% pedal energy efficient full suspension design.
2) The world’s most efficient and traction-aiding suspension system.
They can’t both be right.

Our random meanderings get stuffed into one - or more! - of the following categories.
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| « Apr | Jun » | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 |
| 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 |
| 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 |
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 |
| 29 | 30 | 31 | ||||
Actually we‚re lying about the Maverick since some low-life stole it.
A dogs dinner of links to stuff that we have arranged in an apparently random manner, though I assure you it made sense at the time.
The things we listen to are occasionally logged on Last.fm
New! iPod updating courtesy of iScrobbler.
It doesn't update from the wheels of steel though :-)
Remember kids, vinyl can't carry Digital Rights Management.
in no particular order...
For all that we like the up-to-the minute offerings of the web there‚s nothing like a proper badly photocopied A5 fanzine or a glossily printed proper magazine to keep you occupied on the throne. Here, in no particular order, is our material of choice.
In the UK as we give away our civil liberties in the name of freedom it might be handy to be aware of Photographers Rights.
Don’t let The Man stop you shooting.
If anyone has a full set of NEMBA results (that‚s North of England for you colonial types) then please forward them.
sometimes you just gotta take action, or at least be able to get our hands on the FACTS
May 25th, 2006 at 6:49 pm
Hey don’t forget about “the most successful system in bicycle suspension history”.
May 26th, 2006 at 10:29 am
At least they are modest enough only to claim to be successful, not to be 100% efficient, or better!
May 26th, 2006 at 12:28 pm
but notice the wording…
“pedal energy efficient…”: not so much with traction
“efficicient and traction-aiding…”: not so much with pedal energy
May 26th, 2006 at 12:43 pm
Is this an argument over the technical merits of each design or an argument about the semantics of the marketing BS?